Saturday, May 31, 2014

Engineering Myth: "KTs are the norm!"

"Start getting used to KTs!!" are the first words of wisdom you hear when you enter an Indian engineering college. Is this indeed a harsh reality? Or are we fooling ourselves into this limiting belief that "Failure is normal"? The numbers seem to say a resounding 'Yes'!!

A key contributor is the approach to studying. The normal 'chill out during the semester and slog during the study leave' vs the 'Study regularly during entire semester'
Even the easiest 'study regularly in the entire semester' mode provides 179% more hours than the usual 'Slog during the study leave' plan. Would it be safe to assume that the results might be different too? 179% more work could fetch us at least 30% more in results? Let us see how.

Key Observations during the calculations:
  • Professor are NOT assumed to be perfect in both modes - only 70% effective
  • Only 1 hour of daily home study and just 4 hours on Sunday assumed for the 'Regular' mode! Attendance assumed is the minimum mandated 75%!
  • Effectiveness is key. We fail to realize the reduction in effectiveness when we lose continuity in class and copy assignments. Consistency contributes to a lot.
  • The 'Slog mode' achieves just 35 effective study hours in the entire semester!! Though we seem to attend a lot of classes and do a lot of assignments!! 
  • For all the "chilling out" we think we do, the total hours put in both modes are almost the same(1413 hrs in regular mode and 1158 hrs in slog mode) 
  • The difference is in the outcome i.e. productivity: 87% productivity in Regular mode vs a measly 38% in slog mode. No wonder why slog mode always results in being 'on the border of a KT' despite 'putting in the same amount of work'
  • Almost 720 hours are wasted in the slog mode(more than 70%) Can you imagine how frustrating that can be? Is it surprising that we end up hating engineering and the frustration lasts beyond the academic years?


Questions worth asking:
  • The slog approach relies on studying most in the least time. Can we imagine the amount of unproductivity, stress and fear of failure this can lead to?
  • We think we are chilling out a lot - but in reality, the chill mode gives us only 18% or 255 hrs to chill out, than regular mode. But it leads to 720 hours of WASTAGE!!! Is it worth it? 
  • Instead of 'wasting' 720 hours in working, but not benefiting, what if we consciously decided to miss some classes, spend the time in extra-curricular activities, and then catch up with studies? The 179% advantage might be reduced, but it is still OK!! It would allow us to succeed at studies as well as extra curricular activities! This allows us to build a good 'story' when the placement season arrives
  • If we look at the numbers, the regular approach is actually much easier than the slog approach AND gives us a 179% advantage. It even gives us scope to become an all-rounder, pick up other hobbies.  It is a win-win situation. Why do we then keep opting for the harmful alternative?
Hopefully this forces us to question our limiting beliefs and make our college time easier, less stressful and more effective!


Monday, May 26, 2014

Clarity based Leadership: The path of self-awareness

A Leader is often the stereotypical 'extrovert, great orator, charismatic, impressive personality with a great sense of humor'. Have you not felt yourself trusting, relying, following someone who might exhibit none of these stereotypical qualities? Including people who are not materially 'successful'. What is their secret? 


I call it Clarity based leadership, which stems from self-awareness. 


Let me first talk about self-awareness and leadership individually, and then proceed to showing their relationship. 

What Self-awareness is NOT?
Self-awareness is not "evaluation". Evaluation is 'judgement' - which comes from feedback. But feedback is just an opinion. Other's opinions might be less 'biased' - but they are still opinions. They might even be contradictory - your office colleagues say you are a great listener, your wife says you are not. Who to believe? It is also subjective- someone says your questioning demonstrates intelligence, others say it displays arrogance. Who to believe? And why does the difference occur? Because their opinion/judgment/interpretation is biased too, according to their own conditioning. 
We often go by the 'majority' - but its all perception after all. Second hand truth. Not first hand experience. 
The very fact that there seem to be multiple perceptions implies that the truth is missing. Truth is just a fact, not an outcome of a majority vote. Evaluation including self-evaluation is based on underlying beliefs, conditioning - and therefore not awareness.

What is self-awareness?
Awareness is neutral observation of what IS. Not saying "This is good, I should do this" or "This is bad. I should avoid this". Not even "I should not be judging". But simply observing. The mind will desperately try to 'react' to what is, based on its past memories, beliefs - that's how it survives. But true awareness arises when the mind gives in and becomes silent. The water is undisturbed. Now you can see clearly beneath the surface, without distortion, without having to 'guess', without having to take a majority vote. You see what is. There is clarity. You see the everything in its totality. Not just the fork in the road, but where they end, and where they connect. Its all clear. The decision becomes 'obvious' not an outcome of  'analysis'

But what does this have to do with leadership?
Many believe leadership is about the 'following' you have. But that's 'popularity'. Which is again dependent on majority perception of awesome, cool. You are at the follower's mercy - how can you be the "leader"?
Some say leadership is about being liked - by most of not everybody. But people like you only if you can give them what they want(pleasing) or make them believe that you are giving them what the want(manipulation) or give them what you want in exchange for what you want(motivation: a refined form of manipulation). But motivation relies on keeping the wants, dependency alive. The moment their want ends, the moment their dependency on you ends - you are no longer a leader. You are at best a good "caregiver". 
A true leader is not afraid of the "kids growing up and not needing him". He cultivates leaders, not followers. Only that can lead to a 'synergetic' effect, not sustained dependency. 

Separating 'need' from 'want'
Growing leaders, or people demands seeing what they need - rather than being dictated by what they want. But isn't "what they need" also an opinion? Good question. The answer depends on 'need for WHAT?'. 

If it is "what they need.... so that you can meet your goals" - its still motivation/manipulation etc. If it is "what they need to come closer to the truth", then 'you' are out. But it cannot be YOUR version of the truth. They have to see it for what it is - in order to gain that clarity and knowing which road to take. But if they do not have the clarity, and you are the leader here - what needs to happen to help them achieve that clarity?

Clarity based leadership
You have to be extremely clear yourself first. You also have to be clear that they are NOT clear. That their minds are conditioned. If you start judging that as 'bad', 'immature'..you are 'disturbing the water', The 'cloudiness of the situation' is increasing. If your mind can be undisturbed, and can be aware  of the total situation including their AND YOUR own conditioning - you know what needs to be done. Note that you have not become 'superior'. You have just become AWARE of your conditioning, Hence you are free of it. 

How to cultivate self-awareness?
Its simple - and hence difficult...for a conditioned mind. A mind that seeks heavy proofs, analysis, evidence according to its own conditioning, before it will accept another equally strong "belief". 
All that you need to do is OBSERVE, NOTICE. See "What is happening..." See your reactions, your fears, your thought process, your feelings in situations. WITHOUT TRYING TO STOP THEM. All the while - not just during 10 scheduled minutes of meditation. That's it!!!
Remember that the mind DEPENDS on 'reacting' to survive. A situation produces a sensation, which triggers a memory, which sets of a reaction(judgment/clinging/condemnation), produces another sensation and thus a spiral. When you are only seeing - you have cut off the fuel supply. The "crazy engine chatter" slows down as your self awareness increases. 
Also, you are not 'cultivating' self-awareness. You are just dropping the resistance to what is - including the mind chatter. Refusing to stop the ripples by throwing more stones into the water. Letting it settle...on its own. The more you 'try', the more disturbed it will become. 

Clarity ---> insight --> leadership
When you achieve clarity, you begin to see 'more'...you see how you might be throwing stones into their ponds as well. And you stop doing that. They might condemn you, hate you when you are strict...try to flatter you, congratulate you when you pamper them...but you are undisturbed. Because you are no longer afraid of what is - including your own fears - you are free of fear. Because you are free - You do not "need" anything from them. You do your part, but there is no need to manipulate them into "achieving" anything. This automatically builds trust. People 'trust' your insight more than theirs. Even when it leads them to something that seems scary at first sight. But they trust that you might see what they don't. That eventually, it will lead them to greater good. When this happens, you don't need to 'motivate' them, manipulate them. If they fail, they still take responsibility. Isn't that a sign of real growth?

This also explains why leaders come in many forms - not just the stereotypical 'extrovert, great orator, charismatic, impressive personality with a great sense of humor'. Have you not felt yourself trusting, relying, following someone who might exhibit none of these stereotypical qualities? The common factor between these people is the unshakable inner calm, which might be expressed in a speech, a smile or even silence. But every expression emanates from a beautiful silence, not confused noise. 

Unbelievable but true
No motivational strategies, no 'trying', no incentive systems, not even doing anything for them, not even 'doing' anything for YOURSELF...but just watching yourself. Letting the clarity set in. The rest just happens. 
Leading the way by walking on it, with open eyes, with clarity..(How can you lead if your own sight is clouded?) Without bothering if you are being followed.  That is true leadership

Sunday, May 04, 2014

Finding your passion

Note: The answer is reproduced here. The Quora answer has follow up comments which might be useful as well.

Very good question. Many often struggle with this question, but are unfortunately climbing the wrong ladder - because we just accord a superficial look at these questions. And then wonder why we

Passion and your job

If you do manage to find your passion, you won't need a job to do it.
You have already been learning about it, trying it, spending time on it, can talk about it, don't get threatened by opposing views(because you value deeper understanding, fusing perspectives - over proving your side)
If you are waiting to get into the right job to do it - then its not your passion. Its probably something you are good at and hence, the chances of 'success' are greater. 

StatCounter